| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | gvfontenay(at)lbl(dot)gov |
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Strange explain on partitioned tables |
| Date: | 2010-08-04 13:16:37 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=7cPTu2sVDf17e5haF0vpf2Gh33qYqsKSOAkJE@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Gerald Fontenay <gvfontenay(at)lbl(dot)gov> wrote:
> Thank you for your response. So if I query only my target child table, this
> should be "just like" any other single table wrt planning right? I have
> thousands of these tables. (I suppose that I'm only using inheritance for
> the sake of organization in this situation...)
Yeah, I wouldn't expect planning time to be affected by whether a
table has parents; only whether it has children.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-08-04 14:01:34 | Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-04 13:14:12 | Re: Questions on query planner, join types, and work_mem |