Re: Performance Test for PostgreSQL9

From: Selva manickaraja <mavles78(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance Test for PostgreSQL9
Date: 2011-02-28 05:09:49
Message-ID: AANLkTi=2VYa6PCbwPz7MSefPPt_Z8LPj=PR2uudZZsuc@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

As mentioned in the documentation, I went to the directory src/test/regress
and ran the command. It gives the error

GNUmakefile:15: ../../../src/Makefile.global: No such file or directory
GNUmakefile:80: /src/Makefile.shlib: No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make target `/src/Makefile.shlib'. Stop.

Really can't make any sense out of this.

Any ideas?

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Mark Kirkwood <
mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz> wrote:

> On 28/02/11 16:26, Selva manickaraja wrote:
>
>
>
> We have installed PostgreSQL9 and setup standby(s). Now we have to test the
> performance before we migrate all the data from Informix. The PostgreSQL9
> that we installed is the Linux version from EnterpriseDB which runs on Red
> Hat. The documentation on PostgreSQL website shows that we have gmake from
> source. So for that purpose we downloaded the source into a UBuntu machine
> to gmake and install it. But UBuntu on the other hand complaints that it
> can't find gmake. So looks like we are stuck here.
>
> What should we do?
> (1) Is the a binary for the Regression Test module that can be downloaded
> and ran from the RedHat environment? OR
> (2) If there are no binary, how to proceed if gmake does not run in UBuntu?
>
>
> 'gmake' means GNU make - in the case of Linux, the binary is simply 'make'.
> E.g on my Ubuntu 10.10 system:
>
> $ make --version
> GNU Make 3.81
> Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>
> regards
>
> Mark
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Kirkwood 2011-02-28 05:53:22 Re: Performance Test for PostgreSQL9
Previous Message Bhakti Ghatkar 2011-02-28 05:08:36 Re: Vacuum problem due to temp tables