| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What happened to SSL_CIPHERS? |
| Date: | 2010-10-29 17:39:04 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=2BbwMxvC7YqVTFMxJJUHuf-bWk1_+Mv=QNV76@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:01, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>> So, did ssl_ciphers go away on purpose? If so, why? If not, why isn't
>>> it
>>> accessible?
>>
>> Are you sure you're on an SSL enabled build?
>
> Oh, good call ... I thought I'd installed the SSL build, but apparently not.
>
> Mind you, we *also* need a doc patch. ("This parameter is only available if
> PostgreSQL was built with SSL support").
Actually, I think it'd be more user friendly to make the parameter
still exist and be a no-op (maybe show the value NULL?) on non-SSL
enabled builds. Same goes for all other parameters that depend on a
specific compile flag. That would make life easier on automated tools
*and* on people sitting down at a new installation.
Thoughts?
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-10-29 17:48:18 | Re: typoed column name, but postgres didn't grump |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-10-29 17:01:58 | Re: What happened to SSL_CIPHERS? |