| From: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Round Robin Reviewers <pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Commitfest: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly |
| Date: | 2010-09-29 01:11:00 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=0n_sbZ0XzfU2n-FCMeVaiddWT_hwK0oy3u0Te@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-rrreviewers |
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:03 AM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> The Good:
> - Most patches still in play have a reviewer.
As far as I remember, there were discussions about the issue
"A patch has a reviewer, but in Needs Review state for several weeks "
in 9.0 development.
Do we have any plans for it? According to the commitfest app, one patch
has only one reviewer at once. A new reviewer might avoid reviewing
a patch that have another reviewer already.
--
Itagaki Takahiro
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-09-29 01:18:27 | Re: [RRR] [HACKERS] Commitfest: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly |
| Previous Message | Christian Ramseyer | 2010-09-29 01:08:07 | FTS GIN Index Question |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-09-29 01:16:08 | Re: Proposal: plpgsql - "for in array" statement |
| Previous Message | Itagaki Takahiro | 2010-09-28 23:51:54 | Re: Help with User-defined function in PostgreSQL with Visual C++ |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-09-29 01:18:27 | Re: [RRR] [HACKERS] Commitfest: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2010-09-28 21:03:15 | Commitfest: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly |