Re: COnsidering a move away from Postgres

From: "Jason Tesser" <JTesser(at)nbbc(dot)edu>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: COnsidering a move away from Postgres
Date: 2005-06-30 22:21:34
Message-ID: AA9E9C9ACAFCA545A33A9F6E1E88353E069676@titus.nmi.northlandministries.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Yes I figured it out could I bug one last time about my question :-)
Question: DO I have to define every column I am returning as an out
going parameter?
You have been helpful Tom and I really do appreciate it.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 5:20 PM
To: Jason Tesser
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] COnsidering a move away from Postgres

"Jason Tesser" <JTesser(at)nbbc(dot)edu> writes:
> Problem I ran your test and I am getting as error see below

This is an 8.1 feature not something that exists in current releases.

regards, tom lane

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-06-30 22:32:59 Re: COnsidering a move away from Postgres
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-06-30 22:19:30 Re: COnsidering a move away from Postgres