Re: ALTER DATABASE RENAME with HS/SR

From: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: ALTER DATABASE RENAME with HS/SR
Date: 2010-10-04 19:04:18
Message-ID: A8BD3695FCB6760D35FD78F4@amenophis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

--On 4. Oktober 2010 13:24:37 -0400 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> I understand that we need to disconnect users if the database is
> dropped (it's kind of hard to access a database that's not there any
> more...) but I'm fuzzy on why we'd need to do that if it is merely
> renamed.

Yeah, if there's no real technical reason (besides some potential confusion
by the user...), this feels like overkill. If the behavior is okay, we need
to change the documentation however.

--
Thanks

Bernd

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-10-04 19:05:51 Re: Basic JSON support
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-10-04 19:02:38 Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)