From: | Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
---|---|
To: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Florents Tselai <florents(dot)tselai(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add xicorr(X, Y): support for the xi (ξ) correlation coefficient by Chatterjee |
Date: | 2025-09-08 09:03:18 |
Message-ID: | A7CCDFC7-0AAB-4171-A4C2-8C32C23F3B82@yandex-team.ru |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On 8 Sep 2025, at 12:20, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> However, even if those issues were addressed, my feeling is that this
> is too specialised to be considered for inclusion in core. The fact
> that it exists in Scipy and not a core python module is a hint at
> that. There are a lot of other Scipy stat functions, the vast majority
> of which aren't included in core Postgres.
Kind of +1.
IMO, it's better to have Spearman and Kendal coefficients before original research from 2019.
I don't see anything wrong with having all them in core eventually, cost of maintaining settled math tools must not be too high.
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2025-09-08 09:11:20 | Re: OAuth client code doesn't work with Google OAuth |
Previous Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2025-09-08 08:49:10 | Re: MergeAppend could consider sorting cheapest child path |