Re: Proposal: Implement failover on libpq connect level.

Victor Wagner wrote:
> Rationale
> =========
>
> Since introduction of the WAL-based replication into the PostgreSQL, it is
> possible to create high-availability and load-balancing clusters.
>
> However, there is no support for failover in the client libraries. So, only
> way to provide transparent for client application failover is IP address
> migration. This approach has some limitation, i.e. it requires that
> master and backup servers reside in the same subnet or may not be
> feasible for other reasons.
>
> Commercial RDBMS, such as Oracle, employ more flexible approach. They
> allow to specify multiple servers in the connect string, so if primary
> server is not available, client library tries to connect to other ones.
>
> This approach allows to use geographically distributed failover clusters
> and also is a cheap way to implement load-balancing (which is not
> possible with IP address migration).

I wonder how useful this is at the present time.

If the primary goes down and the client gets connected to the standby,
it would have read-only access there. Most applications wouldn't cope
well with that.

Once we have multi-master replication that can be used for fail-over,
the picture will change. Then a feature like that would be very useful indeed.

> "host=main-server host=standby1 host=standby2 port=5432 dbname=database"

It seems a bit arbitrary to require that all servers use the same port.

Maybe parameters like host2, port2, host3, port3 etc. might be better.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe