Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW

From: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
To: "Etsuro Fujita *EXTERN*" <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Optimization for updating foreign tables in Postgres FDW
Date: 2014-09-09 14:16:13
Message-ID: A737B7A37273E048B164557ADEF4A58B17D33D19@ntex2010i.host.magwien.gv.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> I agree with you on that point. So, I've updated the patch to have the
> explicit flag, as you proposed. Attached is the updated version of the
> patch. In this version, I've also revised code and its comments a bit.

Thank you, I have set the patch to "Ready for Committer".

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-09-09 14:34:08 Re: Join push-down support for foreign tables
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-09-09 14:09:59 Re: bad estimation together with large work_mem generates terrible slow hash joins