Re: pg_upgrade ?deficiency

From: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
To: Karsten Hilbert *EXTERN* <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Hilbert, Sebastian" <Sebastian(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade ?deficiency
Date: 2013-11-20 13:32:58
Message-ID: A737B7A37273E048B164557ADEF4A58B17C5D55D@ntex2010i.host.magwien.gv.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> Let me try to rephrase:
>
> Fact: pg_upgrade can NOT properly upgrade clusters which contain
> databases that are set to "default_transaction_read_only on"
>
> Question: Is this intended ?

I am pretty sure that this is an oversight and hence a bug.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karsten Hilbert 2013-11-20 13:36:08 Re: pg_upgrade ?deficiency
Previous Message Karsten Hilbert 2013-11-20 13:21:15 Re: pg_upgrade ?deficiency

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-11-20 13:33:06 Re: information schema parameter_default implementation
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2013-11-20 13:32:46 Dynamic Shared Memory stuff