Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Making background psql nicer to use in tap tests
Date: 2023-04-07 20:24:04
Message-ID: A68A4DD3-FEF8-4F8D-BA38-819E9ABD5BD2@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 7 Apr 2023, at 18:14, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>> On 7 Apr 2023, at 17:04, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

>> Afaict the failures are purely about patch 2, not 1, right?
>
> Correct. The attached v6 wraps the interactive_psql test in a SKIP block with
> a conditional on IO::Pty being available.

This version was green in the CFBot, so I ended up pushing it after some
documentation fixups and polish.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2023-04-07 20:33:08 Re: Show various offset arrays for heap WAL records
Previous Message Imseih (AWS), Sami 2023-04-07 19:27:17 Re: Add index scan progress to pg_stat_progress_vacuum