Re: DBI, savepoints, transactions, and AutoCommit -- NOT A BUG

From: Daniel Staal <DStaal(at)usa(dot)net>
To: felix(at)crowfix(dot)com, PGSQL-Novice <pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DBI, savepoints, transactions, and AutoCommit -- NOT A BUG
Date: 2011-11-03 00:23:09
Message-ID: A44F3E30D9FE5E98D82C5964@mac-pro.magehandbook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

--As of November 2, 2011 4:53:18 PM -0700, felix(at)crowfix(dot)com is alleged to
have said:

> Well shiver me timbers! I wrote a sample program ... and it works. I
> could have sworn I was logging all SQL executed, but it looks like
> something is slipping by. I've attached the program just to be
> thorough.
>
> Sorry for not discovering before I posted. You guys get enough noise.

Sometimes you just need a different voice. ;) Not a problem, I think.

> ================
># !/usr/bin/perl -w

As the Perl guy at my office: You *do* know the difference between this and
'use warnings;', right? And why the latter is almost always what you want?
(Sorry, it's one of those things I've learned to jump on, as it's often
just Cargo Cult Programming...)

Daniel T. Staal

---------------------------------------------------------------
This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you
are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use
the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will
expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years,
whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of
local copyright law.
---------------------------------------------------------------

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message felix 2011-11-03 00:39:20 Re: DBI, savepoints, transactions, and AutoCommit -- NOT A BUG
Previous Message felix 2011-11-02 23:53:18 Re: DBI, savepoints, transactions, and AutoCommit -- NOT A BUG