Re: backup infrastructure

From: "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net>
To: Dan Langille <dan(at)langille(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: backup infrastructure
Date: 2006-09-13 19:55:57
Message-ID: A2AF4DF1-16FB-4D00-A38C-2BADFA4BAB15@ehpg.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Probably timing, and people probably want to digest the idea a bit.
I'd not be detoured. I think it's an excellent idea. It raises
issues of availability of restoration and access to things that you
may not otherwise have access to though... (No idea if that's
actually the case, just pointing out a possibility).

Gavin

On Sep 13, 2006, at 12:11 PM, Dan Langille wrote:

> On 6 Sep 2006 at 15:30, Dan Langille wrote:
>
>> Gidday folks,
>>
>> One way I can contribute my services to the project is in the form of
>> backup services. You tell me what files need to be backed up from
>> what
>> servers, and it'll be done on the frequency required.
>>
>> Restores can be arranged for those that have admin access. We can
>> keep a designated number of backups online, for immediate access.
>> Older backups will be stored offline.
>>
>> Bacula is my tool of choice. Let me know how I can help.
>
> Is the lack of response a verification that no help is required or
> did I pick a bad time?
>
> --
> Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work
> my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php
>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-13 20:39:00 Re: backup infrastructure
Previous Message Dan Langille 2006-09-13 19:11:40 Re: backup infrastructure