Re: Supply restore_command to pg_rewind via CLI argument

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alexey Kondratov <kondratov(dot)aleksey(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Supply restore_command to pg_rewind via CLI argument
Date: 2021-11-04 12:55:43
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 14 Sep 2021, at 16:05, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> wrote:

>> Do we actually need --target-restore-command at all? It seems to me
>> that we have all we need with --restore-target-wal, and that's not
>> really instinctive to pass down a command via another command..
> Currently we know that --restore-target-wal is not enough if postgresql.conf does not reside within PGDATA.

That's a useful reason which wasn't brought up in the earlier thread, and may
tip the scales in favor.

The patch no longer applies, can you submit a rebased version please?

Daniel Gustafsson

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2021-11-04 13:05:30 Re: Automatic notification of top transaction IDs
Previous Message torikoshia 2021-11-04 12:49:21 Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query