Re: Re: PG fails on Windows Server 2008: could not reattach to shared memory ... : 487

From: Owen Hartnett <owen(at)clipboardinc(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: "Abraham, Danny" <danny_abraham(at)bmc(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: PG fails on Windows Server 2008: could not reattach to shared memory ... : 487
Date: 2010-02-04 21:02:47
Message-ID: A13012CF-B52F-4B79-B3D1-8C5F16352A83@clipboardinc.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Feb 4, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:

> 2010/2/4 Owen Hartnett <owen(at)clipboardinc(dot)com>:
>>
>> On Aug 9, 2009, at 3:10 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:22, Abraham, Danny<danny_abraham(at)bmc(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> Does anybody have a proven way to regenerate this problem?
>>>>
>>>> SO that I can tell that the patch really does fix it?
>>>
>>> No. That's the reason it has taken so long to figure out how to fix it
>>> (which we hopefully have done now).
>>
>> Has a consensus been arrived at? Is this patch rolled into the current system?
>
> The patch is included in the latest versions, yes. I don't recall
> seeing any reports of the problem remaining after the patch, but it's
> not 100% sure of course.

Thanks, Magnus, I can see no reason why we shouldn't attempt to migrate to Server 2008 now.

-Owen

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2010-02-04 22:37:27 Re: Shall I apply normalization in the following case?
Previous Message Mike Ginsburg 2010-02-04 20:50:03 Re: Verify a record has a column in a plpgsql trigger