Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

From: John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>
To: Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Date: 2006-05-18 01:35:34
Message-ID: A0C9B586-2C52-4FDF-AA8B-AC39F96E3E20@pgedit.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers


On May 17, 2006, at 8:08 PM, Mark Woodward wrote:

> What is the best way to go about creating a "plug and play,"
> PostgreSQL
> replacement for MySQL? I think the biggest problem getting PostgreSQL
> accepted is that so much code is available for MySQL.

http://pgfoundry.org/projects/mysqlcompat/

John DeSoi, Ph.D.
http://pgedit.com/
Power Tools for PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Hallgren 2006-05-18 03:28:08 Re: at JavaOne ... is anyone else?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-05-18 00:47:40 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-05-18 02:31:49 Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-05-18 00:47:40 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?