Re: Composite types for composite primary/foreign keys?

From: Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>
To: Wolfgang Keller <wolfgang(dot)keller(dot)privat(at)gmx(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Composite types for composite primary/foreign keys?
Date: 2007-11-19 12:03:01
Message-ID: A09C4FBC-2547-4B5E-B371-E124E88294EE@seespotcode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


On Nov 19, 2007, at 6:17 , Wolfgang Keller wrote:

> I wanted to simplify the schema and make it more "readable" for
> clueless morons like me. >;->

Simplifying the schema is fine (and good!) as long as it exhibits the
same behavior as the more complex one: often in the course of
simplifying you find a solution yourself. However, we cannot help you
if you don't provide adequate information.

Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bill Moran 2007-11-19 13:24:08 Re: Calculation for Max_FSM_pages : Any rules of thumb?
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2007-11-19 11:47:05 Re: Postgre and XML