| From: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "'Marc G(dot) Fournier'" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: running as a service? |
| Date: | 2004-05-15 10:26:45 |
| Message-ID: | A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F45B@harris.memetrics.local |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
> would a wrapper be faster/easier? maybe aim for that for
> 7.5, and full integration for 7.6?
No real difference. I posted a skeleton of the required code here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2004-05/msg00030.php
and was hoping we might get a consensus on the right approach.
Cheers,
Claudio
---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-05-15 12:46:55 | Re: running as a service? |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-05-15 00:28:40 | Re: running as a service? |