Re: APC/socket fix (final?)

From: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
To: 'Tom Lane' <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: APC/socket fix (final?)
Date: 2004-03-26 23:12:12
Message-ID: A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F3CA@harris.memetrics.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


Tom Lane wrote:
> > No need to touch the frontend parts at all. Our APCs are server side
> > only, so it's not a problem there.
>
> Oh really? What if the surrounding app uses APCs?

To my mind, that's actually a vote *for* the work-around, and in /port (in
order to have it propagate to all front-end code as well).

Cheers,
Claudio

---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2004-03-26 23:16:02 Re: APC/socket fix (final?)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-03-26 23:06:16 Re: APC/socket fix (final?)