Re: Removal of win32-specific rename code

From: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
To: 'Bruce Momjian' <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Removal of win32-specific rename code
Date: 2004-03-17 00:00:35
Message-ID: A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F392@harris.memetrics.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


> If your fix works, I will change the Win32-specific code to use open()
> and fdopen(). The only advantage to the old code was that it would
> release locks, then go into a rename loop, which is horid, and we need
> to avoid the loop.

Ah, I see. Should've been obvious you had that in mind actually. Great!

Cheers,
Claudio

---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-17 01:23:09 Re: [HACKERS] Index creation takes for ever
Previous Message Euler Taveira de Oliveira 2004-03-16 19:43:07 Re: change output of \dp