| From: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'Andrew Dunstan' <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win3 |
| Date: | 2004-03-05 12:26:23 |
| Message-ID: | A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B55F359@harris.memetrics.local |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
> Is there a case for forcing -i and ignoring the GUC setting
> on Windows?
> Since we can't do Unix domain sockets there it would seem to
> make sense.
FWIW, I agree. Not much point having a graceful failure, when it is the only
mode of operation. [At most, I say we just issue a warning if the GUC
variable is not set to true]
Claudio
---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Claudio Natoli | 2004-03-05 12:35:23 | Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win3 |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2004-03-05 12:01:11 | Re: [HACKERS] Another crack at doing a Win32 build under MINGW |