Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

From: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
To: 'Bruce Momjian' <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Date: 2003-11-18 15:10:29
Message-ID: A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B02802B@harris.memetrics.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > Speaking of which, any ETA on this? Bruce? If anyone from
> core can indicate
> > how they'd like this architected (from the perspective of code
> > rearrangement), I'm willing to have a crack at this.
>
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/win32.html

No, sorry, I should have been clearer. Here I was referring specifically to
the fork/exec parts, not the entire porting effort.

[I remembered a post of yours of a few weeks ago, mentioning that the
fork/exec bits might be in in "a few weeks"; something along the lines of
that it was taking you a while not due to "issues", but simply a lack of
time (can't find the exact message; might be mis-remembering)]

Probably something you are close to completing, but if not, and you can
describe how you'd prefer any rearrangement, I'm happy taking this one.

Cheers,
Claudio

---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-18 15:18:38 Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-18 15:01:14 Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-18 15:18:38 Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-18 15:01:14 Re: [HACKERS] Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?