Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CreateProcess vs Create Thread

From: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>
To: "'Joshua D(dot) Drake '" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,"'pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org '" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CreateProcess vs Create Thread
Date: 2003-11-13 23:27:52
Message-ID: A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B028018@harris.memetrics.local (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers-win32
> 1. Are we just a bunch of Unix coders trying to develop 
> a product for Win32 or are there any people a part of the Win32 
> port project that actually have REAL, hardcore experience 
> coding at the system level for Win32?

[yells "yes" from the back rows]

> 2. Have we built a test case? For example:
> [snip]
>  Do it with CreateProcess and the with CreateThread... Time the 
> difference, and review the load on the server during the tests...

I agree wholeheartedly with the comments made previously by Steve Tibbett. 

There is no point becoming fixated on the performance merits of
CreateProcess vs CreateThread until we have a working Win32 port, and the
most direct way to that end is CreateProcess. To wit, any comments I have
made previously on the relative benefits of using CreateProcess vs
CreateThread have been focused on "getting the port done", not "best

Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see 

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Marsh RayDate: 2003-11-14 01:58:24
Subject: Re: CreateProcess vs Create Thread
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2003-11-13 18:04:02
Subject: Re: CreateProcess vs Create Thread

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group