Re: Improve checks for GUC recovery_target_xid

On 2/27/26 08:12, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2026 at 2:42 PM David Steele <david(at)pgbackrest(dot)org> wrote:
>
> + GUC_check_errdetail("\"%s\" without epoch must greater than or equal to %u.",
>
> "must greater" shiould be "must be greater"?

Fixed in v2 attached to the prior email.

> "without epoch" seems not necessary to me.

I guess that depends on whether or not we error if the epoch is present,
see below.

> + /*
> + * This cast will remove the epoch, if any
> + */
> + xid = (TransactionId) strtou64(*newval, &endp, 0);
>
> Would it be better to use strtouint32_strict() instead of strtou64()?
> That would allow us to detect invalid XID values larger than 2^32 and
> report an error, similar to what pg_resetwal -x does.

This was my first instinct, but it causes our integration tests to fail
because pg_current_xact_id() returns the xid with epoch. You can fix
this by casting pg_current_xact_id()::xid but this seems like a pretty
big change in usage. I'm OK with it but we'd definitely need to update
the documentation to match.

What do you think?

Regards
-David