On 6/14/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> This is intentional --- implicit casts to text are gone. You should be
> happy that the above now fails, because it's calling your attention to
> the fact that you've got very ill-defined semantics there. Is the
>
thanks for clarification. actually it's not my app, i'm just a bystander
which was asked about the issue :).
reasoning seems to be perfectly valid. i hope they will be happy with it as
well :)
best regards,
depesz