Re: Downgrade pgsql 17 to pgsql 12 question

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Ashish Mukherjee <ashish(dot)mukherjee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Downgrade pgsql 17 to pgsql 12 question
Date: 2025-09-30 09:47:00
Message-ID: 9db5f4a38ad248accaba926ba75e10ed50e5ef1d.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 2025-09-30 at 13:53 +0530, Ashish Mukherjee wrote:
> Now the consideration is to use some other encryption option for the
> database which will work fine on pgsql 17. Cybertec's technology is
> one route, the other is EDB. I am happy to hear experiences of folks
> here with pgsql encryption options for v17 on large databases
> (2.5T in our case).

I will refrain from making a recommendation, but you should know that
data-at-rest encryption will always incur a certain performance penalty.

Whatever solution you choose, you should run performance tests.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Mahoney (Gushi) 2025-09-30 12:34:43 Re: pgpass file in postresql.auto.conf?
Previous Message Ashish Mukherjee 2025-09-30 08:23:23 Re: Downgrade pgsql 17 to pgsql 12 question