Re: Improve the performance of Unicode Normalization Forms.

From: Alexander Borisov <lex(dot)borisov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improve the performance of Unicode Normalization Forms.
Date: 2025-08-01 19:00:08
Message-ID: 9db10eba-a756-4b3f-9550-83cab1a1a39e@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

I'm new here, so please advise me: if a patch wasn't accepted at the
commitfest, does that mean it's not needed (no one was interested in
it), or was there not enough time?
Please tell me how this works for this.
Should I move it to the next commitfest? I'm not quite sure what to do.

I looked and saw that patches are often transferred from commitfest to
commitfest. I understand that this is normal practice?
Please understand, it's not very transparent here, the approach is not
obvious.

What is the best course of action for me?
Thanks!

--
Regards,
Alexander Borisov

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2025-08-01 19:04:20 Missing import in 035_standby_logical_decoding.pl
Previous Message Sami Imseih 2025-08-01 18:45:22 Re: Improve LWLock tranche name visibility across backends