Re: Inaccurate error message when set fdw batch_size to 0

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inaccurate error message when set fdw batch_size to 0
Date: 2021-07-09 00:55:17
Message-ID: 9d067c33-248d-ae92-b64b-396de500c43e@oss.nttdata.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2021/05/26 15:22, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 2:43 PM Bharath Rupireddy
> <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks. That looks better. PSA v4 patch.
>
> Attaching v5 patch rebased on latest master.

The patch could not be applied cleanly because of recent commit d854720df6.
Could you rebase the patch?

- /* these must have a non-negative numeric value */
+ /* these must have a positive numeric value */

Isn't it better to replace this with "these must have a floating point value
greater than or equal to zero"?

- errmsg("%s requires a non-negative numeric value",
+ errmsg("\"%s\" must be a numeric value greater than or equal to zero",

"numeric" should be "floating point"?

+ <quote>foo must be a numeric value greater than zero</quote> or
+ <quote>foo must be a numeric value greater than or equal to zero</quote>
+ if option <quote>foo</quote> expects a numeric value

Maybe this description about numeric value is redundant
because there is already the description about integer value?

- /* Number of workers should be non-negative. */

Isn't it better to replace this with "Number of workers should be greater than zero"
rather than removing the comment?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2021-07-09 01:12:52 Re: Outdated replication protocol error?
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2021-07-09 00:42:59 Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side