Re: WAL feature

From: "Sergey E(dot) Volkov" <sve(at)raiden(dot)bancorp(dot)ru>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WAL feature
Date: 2001-04-28 08:59:42
Message-ID: 9ce0vq$qe5$1@news.tht.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

What about incremental backup ?

"Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> /
: news:200104272103(dot)f3RL3ur23234(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us(dot)(dot)(dot)
>
> WAL was a difficult feature to add to 7.1. Currently, it is only used
> as a performance benefit, but I expect it will be used in the future to
> add new features like:
>
> Advanced Replication
> Point-in-time recovery
> Row reuse without vacuum
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
> + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
> + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl

In response to

  • WAL feature at 2001-04-27 21:03:56 from Bruce Momjian

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2001-04-28 12:15:28 WAL performance with wal_sync_method = open_sync
Previous Message Mike Mascari 2001-04-28 06:08:47 RE: Re: Any optimizations to the join code in 7.1?