Re: Small improvement to compactify_tuples

From: Sokolov Yura <funny(dot)falcon(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Small improvement to compactify_tuples
Date: 2017-07-21 10:49:40
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017-05-17 17:46, Sokolov Yura wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera писал 2017-05-15 20:13:
>> As I understand, these patches are logically separate, so putting them
>> together in a single file isn't such a great idea. If you don't edit
>> the patches further, then you're all set because we already have the
>> previously archived patches. Next commitfest starts in a few months
>> yet, and if you feel the need to submit corrected versions in the
>> meantime, please do submit in separate files. (Some would even argue
>> that each should be its own thread, but I don't think that's
>> necessary.)
> Thank you for explanation.
> I'm adding new version of first patch with minor improvement:
> - I added detection of a case when all buckets are trivial
> (ie 0 or 1 element). In this case no need to sort buckets at all.

I'm putting rebased version of second patch.

Sokolov Yura aka funny_falcon
Postgres Professional:
The Russian Postgres Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
0002-Simplify-PageRepairFragmentation.patch text/x-diff 3.5 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-07-21 11:06:10 Re: pgsql: Add a Gather executor node.
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2017-07-21 10:21:42 Re: Mishandling of WCO constraints in direct foreign table modification