Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?
Date: 2017-03-21 21:23:35
Message-ID: 9c165785-430e-5bac-d8a2-e1b35552bdaa@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Alexander

On 3/10/17 8:08 AM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:

> Results look good for me. Idea of committing both of patches looks
> attractive.
> We have pretty much acceleration for read-only case and small
> acceleration for read-write case.
> I'll run benchmark on 72-cores machine as well.

Have you had a chance to run those tests yet?

Thanks,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2017-03-21 21:24:38 Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability
Previous Message David Steele 2017-03-21 21:19:31 Re: Declarative partitioning optimization for large amount of partitions