Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction

From: "Daniel Verite" <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>
To: "Jeff Davis" <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Order changes in PG16 since ICU introduction
Date: 2023-06-09 12:12:36
Message-ID: 9b8974ba-3b8b-47b4-9fbf-8c309049ccbd@manitou-mail.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jeff Davis wrote:

> I implemented a compromise where initdb will
> change C.UTF-8 to the built-in provider

This handling of C.UTF-8 would be felt by users as simply broken.

With the v10 patches:

$ initdb --locale=C.UTF-8

initdb: using locale provider "builtin" for ICU locale "C.UTF-8"
The database cluster will be initialized with this locale configuration:
default collation provider: builtin
default collation locale: C
LC_COLLATE: C.UTF-8
LC_CTYPE: C.UTF-8

This setup is not what the user has asked for and leads to that kind of
wrong results:

$ psql -c "select upper('é')"
?column?
----------
é

whereas in v15 we would get the correct result 'É'.

Then once inside that cluster, trying to create a database:

postgres=# create database test locale='C.UTF-8';
ERROR: locale provider "builtin" does not support locale "C.UTF-8"
HINT: The built-in locale provider only supports the "C" and "POSIX"
locales.

That hardly makes sense considering that initdb stated the opposite,
that the "built-in provider" was adequate for C.UTF-8

In general about the evolution of the patchset, your interpretation
of "defaulting to ICU" seems to be "avoid libc at any cost", which IMV
is unreasonably user-hostile.

Best regards,
--
Daniel Vérité
https://postgresql.verite.pro/
Twitter: @DanielVerite

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gregory Smith 2023-06-09 12:52:33 Re: Major pgbench synthetic SELECT workload regression, Ubuntu 23.04+PG15
Previous Message Joel Jacobson 2023-06-09 11:56:28 Re: Do we want a hashset type?