Re: proposal: psql statements \gstore \gstore_binary (instead COPY RAW)

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: psql statements \gstore \gstore_binary (instead COPY RAW)
Date: 2016-12-10 02:00:01
Message-ID: 9b767472-7ef5-64ac-a573-4252a9a6ddc3@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/09/2016 08:27 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 12/9/16 9:39 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>> SELECT image FROM accounts WHERE id = xxx
>> \gstore_binary ~/image.png
>>
>> What do you think about this proposal?
>
> Seems reasonable.
>
> I've lost track at this point... is there a way to go the other
> direction with that as well? Namely, stick the contents of a file into
> a field via an INSERT or UPDATE?
>
> I've done that in the past via psql -v var=`cat file`, but there's
> obviously some significant drawbacks to that...

It all looks eerily familiar ...

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-12-10 03:01:48 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement table partitioning.
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2016-12-10 01:27:21 Re: proposal: psql statements \gstore \gstore_binary (instead COPY RAW)