| From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Martín Marqués <martin(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Add exclusive backup deprecation notes to documentation |
| Date: | 2019-03-29 12:49:07 |
| Message-ID: | 9afa5071-d790-797d-b834-cf416e8201a3@pgmasters.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/29/19 12:46 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 8:45 AM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>> Are we planning to back-patch this? The deprecation was added to the
>> docs in 9.6 -- I think these clarifications would be helpful.
>
> I wasn't planning too, but I guess we could consider it. I'd be more
> inclined to back-patch the documentation changes than the message text
> changes, but what do other people think?
I think we should definitely do the docs, I'm 50% on the message. You
could argue that is is a behavioral change, but it is pretty important info.
Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-03-29 12:52:12 | Re: [GSoC 2019] Proposal: Develop Performance Farm Database and Website |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2019-03-29 12:46:35 | Re: Add exclusive backup deprecation notes to documentation |