Re: "Hot standby"?

From: Matheus Ricardo Espanhol <matheusespanhol(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "Hot standby"?
Date: 2009-08-11 11:52:31
Message-ID: 9ae044220908110452i7f39adc7m658b2cac7be6c307@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> Am I off? What other definition of terms justifies the description of "hot
> standby"?
>

I think that "Hot Standby" is associated with the high WAL recovery
capacity.
In my opinion, is a good term to symbolizes the superiority compared with
"Warm Standby".

--
Matheus Ricardo Espanhol
---------------------------------------
Dextra Sistemas
http://www.dextra.com.br/postgres/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2009-08-11 12:17:44 TODO list, was Re: WIP: to_char, support for EEEE format
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2009-08-11 11:52:13 Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows