Re: pgsql: Add list of acknowledgments to release notes

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add list of acknowledgments to release notes
Date: 2018-10-14 14:12:26
Message-ID: 9ad38164-5dfa-badd-1095-c4e0ebd968e2@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On 14/10/2018 04:03, Tom Lane wrote:
> Oct 13, 2018 9:58:10 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener processEvent
> WARNING: Glyph "?" (0x144, nacute) not available in font "Times-Roman".
> Oct 13, 2018 9:58:10 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener processEvent
> WARNING: Glyph "?" (0x15e, Scedilla) not available in font "Times-Roman".
> Oct 13, 2018 9:58:10 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener processEvent
> WARNING: Glyph "?" (0x15f, scedilla) not available in font "Times-Roman".
> Oct 13, 2018 9:58:10 PM org.apache.fop.events.LoggingEventListener processEvent
> WARNING: Glyph "?" (0x131, dotlessi) not available in font "Times-Roman".
>
> I wonder how well these characters will render in different viewing
> tools. Maybe there's not much to be done, but should we entity-ify
> the list where possible?

This is not related to the encoding of these characters in the source.
It's just that we have never used these characters in previous releases
(new contributors). A workaround would be to "unaccent" the affected
names. Or look for a more complete font. Or just leave it alone.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2018-10-14 14:24:55 Re: pgsql: Add TAP tests for pg_verify_checksums
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-10-14 13:26:24 pgsql: Avoid duplicate XIDs at recovery when building initial snapshot