| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz |
| Cc: | bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com, nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net, bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com, rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Add checkpoint and redo LSN to LogCheckpointEnd log message |
| Date: | 2022-07-06 16:11:33 |
| Message-ID: | 9a762503-79c9-e7aa-191a-9bfa0d77cc38@oss.nttdata.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2022/03/16 10:29, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote:
> At Wed, 16 Mar 2022 09:19:13 +0900 (JST), Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in
>> In short, I split out the two topics other than checkpoint log to
>> other threads.
>
> So, this is about the main topic of this thread, adding LSNs to
> checkpint log. Other topics have moved to other treads [1], [2] ,
> [3].
>
> I think this is no longer controversial alone. So this patch is now
> really Read-for-Commiter and is waiting to be picked up.
+1
+ * ControlFileLock is not required as we are the only
+ * updator of these variables.
Isn't it better to add "at this time" or something at the end of the comment because only we're not always updator of them? No?
Barring any objection, I'm thinking to apply the above small change and commit the patch.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | talk to ben | 2022-07-06 16:21:24 | Re: archive modules |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-07-06 15:57:40 | Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits |