Quick Links

Re: Should consider materializing the cheapest inner path in consider_parallel_nestloop()

From:	"Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
To:	tender wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc:	Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Re: Should consider materializing the cheapest inner path in consider_parallel_nestloop()
Date:	2024-04-08 09:40:17
Message-ID:	9FBD029B-3E71-4D47-AB54-938C73A4668F@yandex-team.ru
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

> On 27 Sep 2023, at 16:06, tender wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Do you have any comments or suggestions on this issue? Thanks.
Hi Tender,

there are some review comments in the thread, that you might be interested in.
I'll mark this [0] entry "Waiting on Author" and move to next CF.

Thanks!

Best regards, Andrey Borodin.

[0]https://commitfest.postgresql.org/47/4549/

In response to

Re: Should consider materializing the cheapest inner path in consider_parallel_nestloop() at 2023-09-27 13:06:03 from tender wang

Responses

Re: Should consider materializing the cheapest inner path in consider_parallel_nestloop() at 2024-04-08 10:54:41 from Tender Wang
Re: Should consider materializing the cheapest inner path in consider_parallel_nestloop() at 2024-04-23 08:59:42 from Tender Wang

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Peter Eisentraut	2024-04-08 09:53:40	Re: Catalog domain not-null constraints
Previous Message	Alexander Korotkov	2024-04-08 09:34:09	Re: Table AM Interface Enhancements