| From: | Guido Neitzer <lists(at)event-s(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Shane Ambler <pgsql(at)Sheeky(dot)Biz> |
| Cc: | Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres High Availablity Solution needed for hot-standby and load balancing |
| Date: | 2007-11-30 20:03:06 |
| Message-ID: | 9F6FB2F8-29FB-4C0F-8C04-5D8B981FFD51@event-s.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 30.11.2007, at 12:50, Shane Ambler wrote:
>> I project where the "latest news" page shows the newest entry from
>> March 2005 and the install talks only about PostgreSQL 8.0 isn't
>> really inspiring confidence ...
>
> Although they aren't the fastest with releases, they really aren't
> as bad as that.
Nicely said ... ;-) Yeah, I was looking at the wrong site. Maybe there
should be a redirect to the new page to avoid that.
I have last looked at pgcluster back in 2005 when I was trying to find
an affordable multi master solution an the setup sounded so horrific
that we spent about 10k EUR to get a different solution that is
actually working fine now. Setting this up on just two machines was
about 10 minutes work ...
I hope the setup has changed to the better.
cug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ragnar Heil | 2007-11-30 20:05:38 | Fault Tolerance & Master-master-Replication Solution needed |
| Previous Message | Shane Ambler | 2007-11-30 19:50:04 | Re: Postgres High Availablity Solution needed for hot-standby and load balancing |