Re: abi-compliance-check failure due to recent changes to pg_{clear,restore}_{attribute,relation}_stats()

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mankirat Singh <mankiratsingh1315(at)gmail(dot)com>, pg(at)bowt(dot)ie, andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: abi-compliance-check failure due to recent changes to pg_{clear,restore}_{attribute,relation}_stats()
Date: 2025-10-21 20:44:19
Message-ID: 9E853F63-A3F6-4856-B2B8-D63A9DD562B4@justatheory.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Oct 21, 2025, at 22:21, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I see that baza is currently using the latest tags for <v18. David, will
> it start using the .abi-compliance-history file on the rest of the
> back-branches once it is added?

It should, yes. I added the latest changes from Mankirat to add support for it.

D

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-10-21 21:02:25 Re: Question for coverage report
Previous Message Álvaro Herrera 2025-10-21 20:33:18 Re: Question for coverage report