| From: | Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Dapeng Wang <wangdp20191008(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fix pgstat_database.c to honor passed database OIDs |
| Date: | 2026-04-13 00:43:53 |
| Message-ID: | 9D34D3BC-9F52-489E-98BE-6CB595710446@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Apr 13, 2026, at 08:16, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 09:01:32PM +0800, Dapeng Wang wrote:
>> Without the patch, calling
>> pg_stat_reset_single_table_counters('pg_shdescription'::regclass)
>> incorrectly updates the current database's stats_reset timestamp
>> while leaving the shared db entry (datid=0) unchanged.
>>
>> With the patch, the shared db entry's stats_reset is correctly
>> updated, and the current database's timestamp is not affected.
>
> The coalesce() trick to bypass the fact that the reset timestamp may
> not be reset was a bit ugly, so I have used instead a second reset.
> I have limited the test to check for datid=0, not MyDatabaseId.
>
> There is a bit down in stats.sql an extra portion of the test where we
> use twice pg_stats_reset(). One reset could be removed, but I have
> left it as-is in case someone decides to shuffle or split things in
> this test script, to avoid problems in the future.
>
> And fixed that down to v15.
> --
> Michael
Thank you very much for fixing the test and pushing the patch.
Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2026-04-13 00:47:00 | Re: StringInfo fixes, v19 edition. Plus a few oddities |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2026-04-13 00:43:00 | Re: [PATCH] Reduce pg_class scans in GRANT/REVOKE ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA |