| From: | Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrea Riciputi <andrea(dot)riciputi(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | psycopg(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Extending copy_expert |
| Date: | 2014-10-13 22:56:16 |
| Message-ID: | 9CF5AE17-8CB4-4587-ACDB-71DCA864FBD5@thebuild.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | psycopg |
On Oct 13, 2014, at 1:49 PM, Andrea Riciputi <andrea(dot)riciputi(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> My point was not to get the result, which is trivial, but to get it efficiently.
Given the size of the dataset and the use case, it might very well make sense to write your own small C utility that interacts with PostgreSQL and does what you want. Honestly, in the time it takes to negotiate the process of getting the feature you want into either PostgreSQL or psycopg2, you could have that utility working. :)
--
-- Christophe Pettus
xof(at)thebuild(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | W. Matthew Wilson | 2015-01-23 15:16:09 | Can't register python class for domain? |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2014-10-13 22:52:34 | Re: Extending copy_expert |