Re: Usenet Gateway down.... for two weeks

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Usenet Gateway down.... for two weeks
Date: 2008-02-20 02:07:46
Message-ID: 9B83E0AE5B6DF16B56BC02C4@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> Is there any kind of test we could put in place to make sure this
> doesn't happen again? I mean I can't remember a single day in the last
> 5 years that hackers didn't get at least one message.

The only thing think of is to do something like:

# telnet localhost nntp
Trying ::1...
Trying 127.0.0.1...
Connected to localhost.
Escape character is '^]'.
200 news.hub.org InterNetNews NNRP server INN 2.4.3 ready (posting ok).
GROUP pgsql.hackers
211 48254 37 48358 pgsql.hackers

Now, that said, not sure what the numbers mean ... 48358 is the latest, and 37
is the oldest article number based on the active file ... not sure what the
211/48254 are though ...

The problem is that 38358 will increment if a posting comes in from the
Internet itself, so you can't just check for that to increase, you'd have to
take a look at the Path in the header of the article itself, and look for:

Path: news.hub.org!postgresql.org!pgsql-hackers-owner+m114209

which translates as news.hub.org received from postgresql.org ...

- ----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFHu4ty4QvfyHIvDvMRAh/OAJ42XW8a+Cy3U2IDzs/Q/K1gklyqigCgznuQ
0i/BDIf9NlBH4hIfvJ0sFz0=
=n9N7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2008-02-20 07:38:18 Re: Spam filters on the mailing lists
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-02-20 01:54:35 Re: Usenet Gateway down.... for two weeks