Re: SQL:2011 Application Time Update & Delete

From: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL:2011 Application Time Update & Delete
Date: 2025-11-14 08:38:31
Message-ID: 9B820A52-D2F6-465D-B258-6FE8EBA59FAE@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Nov 14, 2025, at 12:10, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> 21 - 0008 - ri_triggers.c
> ```
> + quoteOneName(attname,
> + RIAttName(fk_rel, riinfo->fk_attnums[i]));
> ```
>
> This patch uses quoteOneName() a lot. This function simply add double quotes without much checks which is unsafe. I think quote_identifier() is more preferred.

I looked further, and realized that quoteOneName() is widely used in ri_triggers.c and the dest string are all defined as size of MAX_QUOTED_REL_NAME_LEN.

So I take back comment 21.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Kukushkin 2025-11-14 08:41:52 Re: Issue with logical replication slot during switchover
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2025-11-14 08:11:48 Re: Update timezone to C99