Re: citext operator precedence fix

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Pg Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: citext operator precedence fix
Date: 2011-09-22 18:16:37
Message-ID: 9B80A980-E9B5-4DFB-892C-CED72FAA0636@kineticode.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sep 22, 2011, at 11:14 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:

>> No, because if 1.1 was installed on 8.4, you'd need the commands
>> to move all its functions into the extension, not re-create them.
>
> Shouldn't a version installed on 8.4 be installed as "unpackaged"?
> Doesn't citext--unpackaged--1.0.sql contain the commands to move all
> its functions into the extension?

It contains everything need to move 1.0 functions into the extension. If Josh adds new functions they obviously would not be moved. So a new script would need to move them. And unpackaged--1.1 does not first run unpackaged--1.0.

Best,

David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-09-22 18:23:32 Re: citext operator precedence fix
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2011-09-22 18:14:35 Re: citext operator precedence fix