RE: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization

From: "Yamaji, Ryo" <yamaji(dot)ryo(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Dmitry Dolgov' <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Cached plans and statement generalization
Date: 2018-11-30 02:06:12
Message-ID: 9A6E5062D5D4DB458C80C2B2920BD71D610148@g01jpexmbkw23
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 3:48 AM, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Thanks for reviewing. Since another CF is about to end, maybe you can
> post the full review feedback?

Since I had been busy with my private work, I couldn't review.
I want to review next commit fest. I am sorry I postponed many times.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message rajan 2018-11-30 04:07:39 Re: vacuum and autovacuum - is it good to configure the threshold at TABLE LEVEL?
Previous Message Amit Langote 2018-11-30 02:04:19 Re: Planning time of Generic plan for a table partitioned into a lot