Re: One question about security label command

Hi Joe,

> >>> 3.) Rework patch for 9.2 (Kohei)
>
Could you wait for the next Monday?
I'll try to work this in the next weekend.
--
NEC Business Creation Division / PG-Strom Project
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe Conway [mailto:mail(at)joeconway(dot)com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 6:54 AM
> To: Adam Brightwell
> Cc: Stephen Frost; Alvaro Herrera; Kohei KaiGai; Kaigai Kouhei(海外 浩平); Tom
> Lane; Robert Haas; 张元超; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org;
> adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydata(dot)com
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] One question about security label command
>
> On 08/30/2015 11:17 AM, Joe Conway wrote:
> >>> 3.) Rework patch for 9.2 (Kohei)
>
> >>> 4.) Finish standing up the RHEL/CentOS 7.x buildfarm member to
> >>> test sepgsql on 9.2 and up. The animal (rhinoceros) is running
> >>> already, but still needs some custom scripting. (Joe, Andrew)
>
> >>> 5.) Additionally stand up a RHEL/CentOS 6.x buildfarm member to
> >>> test sepgsql on 9.1 (no changes) (Joe).
>
> > Additionally I have #5 (the 6.x buildfarm member) created/working and
> > I sent in my registration form. It has not been accepted yet.
>
> Many thanks to Andrew -- #4 and 5 now complete. Rhinoceros is now
> successfully testing sepgsql for 9.2 -> HEAD on CentOS 7.1, and a new
> animal, agama, is testing 9.1 on CentOS 6.7.
>
> Remember, expect 9.2 to fail until/unless we get a reworked patch for it.
>
> Joe
>
> --
> Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
> PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
> Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development