| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org,Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org,Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Provide overflow safe integer math inline functions. |
| Date: | 2017-12-17 01:35:05 |
| Message-ID: | 99F06D02-BB7E-40F1-93BE-7113713F1AC0@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On December 16, 2017 5:31:01 PM PST, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
>> I'm not quite following. Could you check if the same happens without
>> -O2? Not because that'd be a solution, but to narrow down how this
>> happens?
>
>The committed test looks quite broken to me: it's missing some &
>operators. Not sure how that translates into failing to fail the
>configure test,
Hm, true. As you say, it doesn't explain the problem though, it's just weird int to ptr cases. Kinda seems like clang links to a different runtime during the configure tests than what's used for postgres...
Andres
Andres
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-12-17 01:48:32 | Re: pgsql: Provide overflow safe integer math inline functions. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-12-17 01:31:01 | Re: pgsql: Provide overflow safe integer math inline functions. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2017-12-17 01:40:24 | Re: PostgreSQL crashes with SIGSEGV |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-12-17 01:31:01 | Re: pgsql: Provide overflow safe integer math inline functions. |