Re: Couple of patches for jdbc driver

From: Peter T Mount <peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk>
To: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Couple of patches for jdbc driver
Date: 2001-08-22 14:52:33
Message-ID: 998491953.3b83c73151ab3@webmail.retep.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

* Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
|
| This issue came up recently in relation to backpatching a python fix,
| and the conclusion was that jdbc 7.1.X is "a hopeless cause" and I tend
| to agree. I had >6 unapplied jdbc patches at the time we released 7.1.
| They are all now in CVS.

> I've mentioned it before, but I really think it would nice to decouple the
> release cycles of the core engine from the interfaces. Make them separate
> projects.
>
> Just my kroner,
> Gunnar

JDBC never really followed the release cycled exactly any how. It's only since
I had to step back from development that it became more rigid.

Peter

--
Peter Mount peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
PostgreSQL JDBC Driver: http://www.retep.org.uk/postgres/
RetepPDF PDF library for Java: http://www.retep.org.uk/pdf/

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-08-22 15:27:50 Re: Couple of patches for jdbc driver
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-08-22 13:20:04 Re: [PATCHES] patch for jdbc BigDecimal bug