| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Mikhail Matrosov <mikhail(dot)matrosov(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, ewan_higgs(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: Configure with thread sanitizer fails the thread test |
| Date: | 2021-07-23 21:18:37 |
| Message-ID: | 997998.1627075117@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2021-07-23 13:42:41 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> TBH, I wonder why we don't just nuke thread_test.c altogether.
> +1. And before long it might be time to remove support for systems
> without threads...
I'm not prepared to go that far just yet; but certainly we can stop
expending configure cycles on the case.
Should we back-patch this, or just do it in HEAD? Maybe HEAD+v14?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Dilger | 2021-07-23 21:24:04 | Re: Delegating superuser tasks to new security roles (Was: Granting control of SUSET gucs to non-superusers) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-07-23 21:15:24 | Removing "long int"-related limit on hash table sizes |